Homepage
Papers
Submissions
Editorial Policy
Scope
Uniqueness
Organization

       Contact

 

 

A    U n i q u e    J o u r n a l

The JOPT has a unique goal: to cross-fertilize research across the various communities engaged in the construction of privacy technology. JOPT is being launched at a time when several technical communities are actively engaged in some form of privacy problems related to a specific application domain. There is a serious lack of communication between the communities and no community whose primary focus is to develop the foundations of the science of privacy. While a lot of good and useful research is underway, lessons learned in one community are often not shared with other communities, causing researchers to re-invent or ignore known results altogether. The JOPT addresses these needs, and by doing so, fosters the growth of privacy technology in all its constituent domain communities. The JOPT provides a mechanism for researchers to share results across communities by: (1) publishing generalizable findings in the JOPT; and, (2) applying generalized findings learned from the JOPT to constituent domains. We expect researchers to continue to publish domain-specific findings in community publications thereby applying generalized knowledge (from the JOPT) to specific application areas and completing the knowledge-sharing cycle.

Below is a survey of some overlapping scientific communities currently addressing privacy technology. These communities are considered application domains for findings reported in the JOPT:

  • Bioinformatics (Genetic Information)
    Related content: given repositories of DNA sequences and other forms of genomic data, methods to provide these repositories for pharmaco-genomic and population genetic studies while providing privacy protections, notwithstanding the uniqueness of the data relationship to subjects.

  • Biometrics
    Related content: methods by which humans are identified in data and methods for detecting and preventing identity theft.

  • Computer security
    Related content: privacy problems from the standpoint of secure communications. Techniques that insulate against eavesdropping, provide secure payments, etc.

  • Computer theory
    Related content: encryption, zero-knowledge proofs, multi-party computations, and the use of trusted third parties.

  • Database security
    Related content: access controls and audit trails to identify intrusions and maintain accountability.

  • Medical informatics
    Related content: privacy protection methods for sharing medical data, where data includes information provided in a wide variety of fomats (e.g., clinical notes, images, DNA sequences, lab results, prescriptions, web logs).

  • Policy specification and enforcement
    Related content: methods to automatically express and enforce privacy policies and preferences. Two threads: digital rights management (DRM) and privacy policy specifications (e.g., P3P) fuel this emerging community, expanding attention into enterprise-wide solutions and notions of privacy rights management.

  • Privacy-preserving data mining
    Related content: privacy protection (primarily by outlier detection and uses of suppression and additive noise) such that data mining algorithms continue to provide reasonable results from protected data.

  • Statistical disclosure control
    Related content: methods to provide tabular and field-structured data such that unusual information is masked or removed while statistical properties in field-structured data remain.

  • Trustworthy computing
    Related content: methods to push security and privacy problems into the programming environment, or alternatively, to hold the modules within the computational environment responsible for prohibiting violations.

  • Ubiquitous computing and semantic web
    Related content: a variant of policy specification and enforcement research (though separately identified) focused on networks of sensors, cameras, and web locations.


  • Other areas
    Privacy technology analyses from Economic, Legal, and Policy perspectives.


 

 

     
Copyright 2004-2006 Carnegie Mellon University